Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

From Inside the Monastery (Ask your Favorite Questions)

Posted on Jan 8th, 2009 by True Eloquence : Spiritual Hunk True Eloquence
30krmti
Photo (Mini-holinesses) courtesy of 

Hello,
I have been planing now quite for sometime to do a series of documentary videos on Buddhist monks (both young and adults), expressing their motivations, backgrounds, plans, etc.  I am curious that lay community (non-monastics) would have more interesting questions in their mind than we insiders do. I obviously started a few threads on monastics earlier here, but that's just from my own perspectives. So I am hoping that this time you can ask your own favorite questions here and I might include them in my interviews. 

In my college, I have many monastic friends as well as students who come from different parts of the world like Korea, China, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, Sri Lankan, Bangladesh, India and Thailand. They uphold different traditions, mainly of Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana, with their own unique cultural characteristics, but at the same time practicing the basic tenets of Buddhism. I am sure the Buddha has taught One Dharma, but presented only in different context according to the listener's ability to grasp the meaning.  

With this project done, we would be able to hear how each monastic has embarked upon and what ultimately have they gotten to contribute to the world peace. 

I look forward to your questions and inputs.  

Thanking you,
Assaji
  
My youtube videos:
Access_public Access: Public 17 Comments Print views (234)  

Another Question from Anna (HummingBird)

Posted on Jan 25th, 2009 by True Eloquence : Spiritual Hunk True Eloquence
Path to higher Consciousness

Assaji, if you have a moment – I'd be so interested if you could take a peek at this website and see if or how it relates to a Buddhist perspective. Thank you so much http://www.kheper.net/topics/Jung/collective_unconscious.html

Reply:

According to Buddhist Philosophy, consciousness/mind (citta/vijnana) is only one and the rest are its concomitants (cetasika), just like the governor in relation to the governed. In another word, when you say "happy mind", happy is qualifying the mind. Same is with "sad mind", "angry mind", etc. These qualities are its associates. They arise together with the mind. However, one must not take this mind/consciousness to be the "Ego/Self" as we see in the diagram below: http://www.kheper.net/topics/Jung/collective_unconscious.html

Because if the consciousness/mind is the ego (a permanent entity), then enlightenment or liberation is impossible. Foolish will remain foolish forever, intelligent will remain intelligent forever. Poor will be poor forever, rich will be rich forever. That theory contradicts in itself. There are no layers of mind/consciousness. Consciousness is a process or rather consciousness is no more than an empirical or functional reality that results from an assemblage of conditions. That the consciousness (citta) is the chief is also to be understood from the fact that the unenlightened are attached to it - not to the concomitants (cetasikas) - as the Atman (Ego/Self).

Moreover, when a person is liberated, one speaks only of the consciousness (citta) being liberated even though it is at that moment being accompanied by its concomitants (cetasikas) and dharmas belonging to other skandhas (factors). This is once again because these accompanying dharmas are all depended on the consciousness (citta), and when the consciousness (citta) is pure, the other skandhas (factors) are likewise pure.

We should clearly understand what do we mean by consciousness and how consciousness comes about. Consciousness comes about with the contact of eye-organ and the external object as a unit. For instance, when my eye-organ hits on a book (external object), only then the consciousness of a book is arisen. Other than that, consciousness is merely an immaterial dharma. But then again that image imprinted over again and again can perpetually co-exist in the "mental consciousness" (mano-vijnana) that recognizes that particular object whenever I see that again and it continues through out time and space; thus samsara. This consciousness can function pertaining to the three periods of time: past, present and future, while in fact, the so called "original nature" of the mind/consciousness was/is nothing but a pure impersonal dharma, that is often ineffable in its highest sense. It can be realized in deep/high meditational (jhanic) experiences, when every delusional thoughts, i.e. prapanca-s (imaginations/conceptual proliferation) are suspended or dis-communicated. However, one has to be really - i have to emphasize here - really careful not to be misled at this crucial stage, because this fine consciousness (citta) can seem like the "Ego/Self" existing throughout time. With ethereal bliss gained from the seclusion of some defilements by the near-saint-yogi, it's still plausible to attach to that desirable object thinking it is the ultimate permanent entity, while in fact, it is not. The yogi must finally go beyond even that stage in order to become fully enlightened and liberated.      

I hope this explanation is helpful to your understanding. 

Access_public Access: Public 6 Comments Print views (547)